1.”Power Of Observation” & 2.”Parenting Styles”

/in /by

1.”Power of Observation”

Select one (1) of the following concepts to examine: in-group / out-group, bystander effect, conformity, nonconformity, foot-in-the-door strategy, or door-in-the-face strategy. Next, describe one (1) situation in which you observed the concept chosen. (Situations can be anything from observing people in a grocery store to interacting with your children or a colleague, among many others.) Then, identify the concept you observed and discuss how it relates to the situation.

2. “Parenting Styles”

Select two (2) of Diana Baumrind’s parenting styles, as discussed in the text. Compare and contrast two (2) similarities and two (2) differences of the styles you chose. Next, describe the effectiveness of each of the styles.
NO PLAGARISM

Lifespan And Development Psychology

/in /by

In your opinion, considering all that you have learned about adolescence, what do you think are the most difficult hurdles an adolescent may struggle to overcome? Explain and give details.

 

*No Plagiarism

*350 words minimum

*APA Format, cite all references only peer reviewed sources. No .com, or .org

*Must have within 2 hours of handshake

Psychology Midterm

/in /by

Midterm Exam

  • This exam includes 50 questions
  • The midterm exam covers all material from Chapters 1–5
  • Lectures and chapter readings are testable material
  • You will have 120 minutes to finish
  • Only serious inquiries apply

Non-Experimental Designs

/in /by

For this assignment, again, it is beneficial that you keep the topic you would like to research for the capstone proposal in mind. The capstone will require a literature review for your proposal, of which you may use articles obtained during this course.

Select a peer-reviewed, non-experimental research study that exemplifies a correlational and quasi-experimental design (use keywords method, results, and discussion in your Boolean search). These studies can be found using tools such as the GCU Library and Google Scholar.

Write 500-750-words in which you:

  1. Compare the research design of the two studies chosen.
  2. Were the research designs appropriate to their hypothesis (the goal of the research or research question)? Why or why not?
  3. Discuss the limitations of drawing conclusions from a non-experimental study.
  4. Did the study have a random sample? Were there other problems that were noticed?

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

In Topic 5, you created a treatment plan for your client.

/in /by

In Topic 5, you created a treatment plan for your client. Create a SOAP note that would go in the client’s chart following the visit. Post the SOAP note as a reply to this discussion thread. For follow-up discussion, evaluate at least two of your peers’ SOAP notes. Would you have documented anything differently? Why or why not?

In Topic 5, you created a treatment plan for your client. If your client was to attend a group therapy session, write a progress note for that client’s participation in that group. How is writing a group progress note different than an individual progress note?

  • attachment

    ElizaTreatmentPlan1.docx

312 Discussion Number 1

/in /by

Our textbook defines social psychology as “… the scientific study of how people think about, influence, and relate to one another” (Myers & Twenge, 2019, p. 2).

For this discussion, briefly describe one of the experiments* in our text and tell whether and how it does or does not align with the definition provided above. You will see that some of the examples/experiments/scenarios described in our textbook reveal a dark side of human nature. As we consider this from a Christian worldview perspective is there any hope for us?

*Use any experiment described in our textbook. To help you get started, here are some examples you may search for: Conformity: Asch, Zimbardo, Milgram; Social Learning/Aggression: Bobo the Doll; Self-fulfilling Prophecy: Rosenthal & Jacobson

Please review the Discussion Assignment Instructions  and interact with your classmates’ threads after you have submitted your thread in response to the provided prompt.

  • attachment

    SocialPsychology13thEditionbyDavidMyers.pdf
  • attachment

    SocialPsychology13thEditionbyDavidMyers.pdf

Sample T-Test NO PLAGERISM

/in /by

For this assignment, use data from W1 Midweek Assignment.ATTACHED

Using Microsoft Excel and following the instructions given in your lecture, compute a one-sample t-test comparing the age of your sample to the age of the general population of college students in traditional on-ground universities. Assume the population mean is 21.

Move your Microsoft Excel output into a Microsoft Word document.

  1. Write 1 paragraph to explain how you located and determined the critical value of t, and how you determined whether your obtained t-statistic was significant.
  2. Write a 1-paragraph, APA-formatted interpretation of the results modeled on the example given in your lecture.
  • attachment

    W1MIDWEEK.xlsx

When computing a t-test, it is important to distinguish between directional and nondirectional hypotheses

/in /by

RESPONDING TO DISCUSSION 300 WORDS EACH

/in /by

respond 300 words:

There would be a unidirectional hypothesis with
Ho: Older same number of accidents or more than younger.
Ha: Older fewer accidents than younger.
The rejection region at the 5% level is all on the left side of the curve (fewer accidents than younger.) There is a larger area for rejection, so the absolute value of the test statistic can be smaller to reject the null hypothesis than the non-directional.
Non-directional:
Ho: older accidents=younger accidents
Ha:; the two are different or not equal
This one has a rejection region on both sides, so the absolute value of the test statistic is greater than in the first one to be in the rejection region
Given that older people and younger people both have more accidents, I would favor the nondirectional hypothesis which will look for a difference between the two. That is generally the preferred way to go, unless there is a strong suggestion one is better than the other and the study was set up that way.

Psychology Assignment

/in /by

Kindly assist with the following assignment

Socioeconomic status (SES) is generally defined as being a combination of a person’s or family’s income, education, and occupational/societal status. Those three things often go together, but not always. For example, some people have graduate degrees but are unemployed, while other people—think pro athletes—may have little education, yet get a lot of money and prestige. Still, there’s usually a fairly strong correlation between income, education, and status.

It turns out that in the United States, SES is one of the biggest predictors of children’s health—the higher the SES, the better the physical health. Your job for this question is to describe at least four separate reasons for this linkage. You aren’t required to specifically mention Bronfenbrenner’s theory in your answer, but you do need to provide answers that address at least 3 levels of his model.