Please can you do this Unit 5 Assignment 1 & Unit 5 Discussion 1? $40.00 Due (Friday) 4/27/2018. 

 

Unit 5 Assignment 1 

Diagnostic Skill Application I

For this assignment, you are provided with two case studies (linked in the Resources):

· The Case of Jenny:
Jenny is a 29-year old single female who lives with her mother. She is bi-sexual, but is not currently dating. Jenny was recently in a relationship with a man, and they lived together briefly. They parted amicably when they just did not seem to be enjoying being together. Jenny moved back in with her mother, Barbara, to allow her boyfriend to take in a roommate to cover her share of the rent. She works as a bank teller and makes a modest income. She felt moving back home would allow her to provide some financial help to her mother. Jenny’s mother raised her as a single parent. Jenny and Barbara have shared many ups and downs over the years. Things were never easy, but they always made it through. Barbara is becoming increasingly concerned that Jenny is giving up on life and needs to snap out of it.

· The Case of Marisol:
Marisol is a 40-year-old single female from a tight-knit Puerto Rican family. She is employed full time as a data analyst for a technology company. She has steadily progressed in her career by working for relatively small companies where her role allowed her to work relatively independently. Unfortunately, working for small organizations was less stable financially, so she has been working for a larger company for the past four years. Interacting with a larger work group has challenged her comfort zone. She prefers to spend time with a network of close friends she has known most of her life, with whom she visits one-on-one. Her family lives in the area, and she sees them frequently. Her parents and older brother have always provided a support system and practical help. She enjoys quiet evenings alone or at the home of her brother and his family. Her friends and family privately wonder why she has never dated or wanted to travel.

Download Unit 5 Assignment Template. Use it to complete your assignment.

Instructions

For each case study, you will complete a descriptive diagnosis using tools you select from the list of assessment tools provided later in the assignment. Each case requires the following information to be addressed:

· Identify presenting concerns from the client’s perspective as described in the video and accompanying narrative. Include relevant cultural and systemic considerations that frame the client’s presentation.

· Describe what information is still needed to make a differential diagnosis and evaluate how at least one assessment tool, which is listed in the List of Assessment Tools resource, will aid in obtaining that information. The Differential Diagnosis Decision Tree may be helpful to guide this process.

· Present DSM-5 and ICD-10 codes, including relevant V and Z codes.

· Provide a descriptive rationale for the DSM diagnosis that best fits the information provided including relevant ICD codes. This should be written in a narrative form using complete sentences. Support your rationale with scholarly sources. Optional readings found in the course syllabus may be particularly relevant.

· Determine if a medication consultation is appropriate and provide a rationale with support from scholarly sources.

List of Assessment Tools and Supporting Resources

· Beck, A. T., Epstein, N., Brown, G., & Steer, R. (1988). Beck Anxiety Inventory. Psyctests, doi:10.1037/t02025-000

o Bardhoshi, G., Duncan, K., & Erford, B. T. (2016). Psychometric meta‐analysis of the English version of the Beck Anxiety Inventory. Journal of Counseling & Development, 94(3), 356–373.

o Review this source to review how to interpret the Beck Anxiety Inventory.

· Derogatis, L. R. (1977). Symptom checklist-90–revised. Psyctests, doi:10.1037/t01210-000

o Grande, T. L., Newmeyer, M. D., Underwood, L. A., & Williams, C. R. (2014). Path analysis of the SCL-90-R: Exploring use in outpatient assessment. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 47(4), 271–290.

o Review this source to review how to interpret the SCL-90-R.

· Prevatt, F., Dehili, V., Taylor, N., & Marshall, D. (2015). Anxiety Symptom Checklist. Psyctests, doi:10.1037/t39906-000

· Beck Depression Inventory–II

o Erford, B. T., Johnson, E., & Bardoshi, G. (2016). Meta-analysis of the English version of the Beck Depression Inventory–Second edition. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 49(1), 3–33.

o This resource will help you use the Beck Depression Inventory-II if you access that assessment tool.

Submission Requirements

· Written communication: Written communication must be grammatically correct and free of errors that detract from the overall message. Writing should be consistent with graduate level scholarship.

· APA formatting: Title page, main body, and references should be formatted according to the current APA style and formatting.

· Number of resources: Minimum of six scholarly resources. Distinguished submissions typically exceed this minimum.

· Length of paper: 5–7 typed double-spaced pages. Abstract and Table of Content pages are not necessary.

· Font: Times New Roman, 12 point.

Turnitin

Resources

· Diagnostic Skill Application I Scoring Guide.

· Psychometric Meta‐Analysis of the English Version of the Beck Anxiety Inventory.

· Writing Feedback Tool.

· Meta-Analysis of the English Version of the Beck Depression Inventory.

· American Psychiatric Association.

· Differential Diagnosis by the Trees.

· Beck Anxiety Inventory.

· Path Analysis of the SCL-90-R: Exploring Use in Outpatient Assessment.

· Anxiety Symptom Checklist.

· APA Style and Format.

· The Case of Jenny | Transcript.

· Symptom Checklist-90–Revised.

· The Case of Marisol | Transcript.

· Unit 5 Assignment Template [DOC].

Unit 5 Assignment Template.

[Unit and Assignment Title]

[Learner Name]

[COURSE NUMBER – NAME]

[Date]

[Professor Name]

 

Unit and Assignment Title

Review paper guidelines on page requirements and number of sources required.  Unless citing a classic work, aim to cite research articles and texts published within the past 5 years.  Optional articles in the course syllabus can be located by entering the title of the article in the search tool Summon found on the main page of the Capella Library. When you finish writing your paper, re-read it to check for errors and make sure your ideas flow well. A helpful tip is to read your paper aloud to yourself.  Please submit your papers to turnitin to avoid plagiarism and improve the originality in your writing. Also, remember as a Capella learner you have FREE access through iGuide to personal tutoring services with Smarthinking.com.

Presenting Concerns: Case of Jenny

Provide a summary of the most relevant symptoms that seem to be causing Jenny the most distress or danger because they deviate from normal and represent dysfunction. Include how these symptoms may have a biological or neurological basis. The Distinguished criterion is,

“Identifies the main symptoms observed in people who are experiencing psychological disorders and provides specific examples to support the explanation”.  This should be presented in full sentences formatted in a paragraph.

Differential Diagnosis: Case of Jenny

Summarize how you moved through the process of selecting the diagnoses that are possibilities that need to be considered. Use the appropriate decision tree from the Differential diagnosis by the trees: DSM-5 handbook of differential diagnosis.

The Distinguished criterion is, “Identifies the methods used for differential diagnosis in two case studies including the application of a DSM decision tree”. This should be presented in full sentences formatted in a paragraph.

Symptom Checklists: Case of Jenny

You are encourage to consider the List of Assessment Tools at the end of this docment described in the optional articles listed. The Distinguished criterion is “Describes the application of specific symptom checklists appropriate to each case with clear connection to the differential diagnosis”.

Systemic Assessments: Case of Jenny

You are encouraged to select an assessment described in Hamilton and Carr (2016) assuming that Jenny presents for treatment with her mother. The Distinguished criterion is “Describe the application of specific assessments relevant to marriage, couple, and family counseling appropriate to each case supported by scholarly literature”.

DSM and ICD Diagnosis: Case of Jenny

Address the Distinguished criterion, “Applies the current DSM and ICD to the diagnosis of a focus client seen in family counseling and an additional family member, and providing support for diagnostic choices”.   List the code for both the current DSM and ICD. A chart listing ICD codes that correspond to DSM can be found at: https://www.psychiatry.org. After you list the diagnosis and applicable V or Z codes that provide a context, explain how you came to decide the diagnosis is appropriate in a paragraph.

Medication Referral/Consultation: Case of Jenny

Address the Distinguished criterion, “Describes the role of psychopharmacological medications for appropriate medical referral and consultation and incorporates relevant examples”. Describe whether a referral for a medication consultation is appropriate for Jenny specifically. This should be presented in full sentences formatted in a paragraph citing scholarly sources.

Presenting Concerns: Case of Marisol

Provide a summary of the most relevant symptoms that seem to be causing Marisol the most distress or danger because they deviate from normal and represent dysfunction. Include how these symptoms may have a biological or neurological basis. The Distinguished criterion is,

“Identifies the main symptoms observed in people who are experiencing psychological disorders and provides specific examples to support the explanation”.  This should be presented in full sentences formatted in a paragraph.

Differential Diagnosis: Case of Marisol

Summarize how you moved through the process of selecting the diagnoses that are possibilities that need to be considered. Use the appropriate decision tree at from the Differential diagnosis by the trees: DSM-5 handbook of differential diagnosis. 

The Distinguished criterion is, “Identifies the methods used for differential diagnosis in two case studies including the application of a DSM decision tree”. This should be presented in full sentences formatted in a paragraph.

Symptom Checklists: Case of Marisol

You are encourage to consider the List of Assessment Tools at the end of this docment described in the optional articles listed. The Distinguished criterion is “Describes the application of specific symptom checklists appropriate to each case with clear connection to the differential diagnosis”.

Systemic Assessments: Case of Marisol

You are encouraged to select an assessment described in Hamilton and Carr (2016) assuming that Marisol presents for treatment with her brother and parents. The Distinguished criterion is “Describe the application of specific assessments relevant to marriage, couple, and family counseling appropriate to each case supported by scholarly literature”.

DSM and ICD Diagnosis: Case of Marisol

Address the Distinguished criterion, “Applies the current DSM and ICD to the diagnosis of a focus client seen in family counseling and an additional family member, and providing support for diagnostic choices”.   List the code for both the current DSM and ICD. A chart listing ICD codes that correspond to DSM can be found at the APA website listed in the assignment resources. After you list the diagnosis and applicable V or Z codes that provide a context, explain how you came to decide the diagnosis is appropriate in a paragraph.

Medication Referral/Consultation: Case of Marisol

Address the Distinguished criterion, “Describes the role of psychopharmacological medications for appropriate medical referral and consultation and incorporates relevant examples”. Describe whether a referral for a medication consultation is appropriate for Marisol specifically. This should be presented in full sentences formatted in a paragraph citing scholarly sources.
References

Hamilton, E., & Carr, A. (2016). Systematic review of Self‐Report family assessment measures. Family Process, 55(1), 16-30. doi:16)10.1111/famp.12200

NOTE:  Consult your APA manual for proper examples on citing and referencing APA style. The Capella

Writing Center also has helpful tutorials.

Unit 5 Discussion 1

Eating Disorder Diagnosis and Assessment

Review the following media (linked in the Resources):

· Case Study: Nancy

Based on the information in the case study, address the following questions using headings to match content in each bullet point:

· How would you incorporate the DSM-5 and the relational codes into the assessment phase with this couple or family?

· What other diagnostic or assessment processes would you use?

· How do larger systems impact the development of eating disorders? These systems might include sociocultural background, family of origin (that is, the family a person grew up in), current relationship dynamics, and the influence of the media.

Support your ideas with references to the course texts, articles from this learning unit, articles from the Optional Readings for Principles of Psychopathology list, or articles from peer-reviewed journals that you locate in the Capella University Library.

Response Guidelines

Respond to the initial discussion post of one other learner. What reactions do you have to the ideas the learner has presented? Include examples from your own experience to support your perspective, and raise questions to continue the dialogue.

Learning Components

This activity will help you achieve the following learning components:

· Identify presenting problems from a client’s perspective.

· Explore resources to aid in differential diagnosis.

· Explore assessment tools that collect information relevant to identifying systemic issues.

· Use language appropriate for a counseling professional.

· Cite and reference resources, giving appropriate credit for another’s work.

Resources

· Discussion Participation Scoring Guide.

· Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders.

· Capella University Library.

· Masters in Counseling – Research Guide.

· Case Study: Nancy.

Culture clearly has strong effects on mental disorders.  How does this influence what you think about what is normal or abnormal?  The German Philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche thought that society itself might be neurotic, and suggested that our societies set up a “neurosis of health.”  What do you think he meant by that?  Do you think that society is unhealthy, and adapting to a sick society makes us depressed, anxious and off balanced?

100 to 150 words

Case of Jake Levy

In this Assignment, you prepare a 5-minute video case presentation. It is common to present a case analysis in multidisciplinary team meetings or with your supervisor and colleagues. This assignment offers you an opportunity to provide insights and perspectives to a case. To prepare:  Use the same case study that you chose in Week 2. Case of Jake Levy

• Read this article listed in the Learning Resources: González-Prendes, A. A., & Thomas, S. A. (2009). Culturally sensitive treatment of anger in African American women: A single case study. Clinical Case Studies, 8(5), 383–402. https://doi-org.ezp.waldenulibrary.org/10.1177/1534650109345004  This article provides a nice framework for how the authors’ cognitive-behavioral theoretical orientation shaped the conceptualization of the case and assessment and intervention.  Submit a Kaltura video of yourself discussing the client. Your video should be no longer than 5 minutes.   Your video presentation should include the following:

• In 1 to 2 sentences, identify and describe the presenting problem.

• In 1 to 2 sentences, briefly define and conceptualize the problem from a cognitive-behavioral theoretical orientation.

• Formulate 2 assessment questions that you will ask the client to better understand the client’s problem. Remember, the assessment questions should be guided by the cognitive-behavioral theory.

• In 1 to 2 sentences, identify two goals for treatment. Again, remember, the goals should be consistent with cognitive-behavioral theory.

• In 1 to 2 sentences, describe the treatment plan from a cognitive-behavioral theoretical orientation. Remember, the treatment plan should align with the goal(s) for work.

• Discuss one outcome you would measure if you were to evaluate whether the intervention worked, and explain how this is consistent with cognitive behavioural theory. Evaluate one merit and one limitation of cognitive behavior theory as it relates to the case study.

• Evaluate the application of cognitive-behavioral theory in relation to a diversity issue pertinent to the case.