PS300 Unit9Assignmenrt

In the Unit 9 Assignment, you will be given five scenarios to review and analyze. Using the Unit 9 Assignment Template, respond to the following for each:

  1. Of the study methods discussed in class (single case, observational, survey, quasi-experimental, or single factor), which method would be ideal for the researcher to use? Why?
  2. Based on the study method you identified, briefly describe how the researcher could structure their study.
  3. What are strengths and limitations to the use of this study method?
  4. Each scenario has a possible bias/error associated with it. Based on the bias/error listed for this scenario, how could this affect the study results, and how could a researcher work around this?
  • attachment

    U9_AssignmentTemplate6.docx

Discussion: Case Study

Discussion: Case Study Task: Reply to this topic

Top of Form

Bottom of Form

Review the case studies in Chapter 4 of the text.

Assess a case study of your choice and describe why you have given the client the diagnosis you did and how this diagnosis most closely matches the symptoms. Using the same case example, identify the factors that would specifically affect treatment in the case (familial, environmental, and so on).

Attachments:

Textbook Chapter 4

Article: Internalizing and Externalizing Problems, Depression, and Self-Esteem in Non-Detained Male Juvenile Offenders

  • attachment

    document31.pdf
  • attachment

    Functional_Behavioral_Assessment_Diagnosis_and_T…_—-_Chapter_4_Function-Derived_Treatment_Options.pdf

Thread Prompt: This module/week, watch for media presentations

Discussion Board Forum 4

Thread Prompt: This module/week, watch for media presentations that use some kind of research as part of the presentation. This could be television, radio, internet, a live presentation, or some other kind of presentation. This part of the assignment is designed to help you realize how often research concepts are presented in everyday life. You may use something that you noticed earlier during this course as well; it does not need to be confined to this module/week necessarily. Do not use fictional sources.

  1. Describe the presentation you saw or heard during the preparation phase of the assignment.
  2. Critique the presentation from the perspective of research methodology. Identify at least 3 issues/features that relate to research. Use any of the research concepts from the textbook, presentations, or other course discussion.
  3. Create your own appropriately worded heading (use proper levels of headings) to introduce the kinds of issues/features that you critique.
  4. List the appropriately formatted citation and reference for your source.

Here are examples of the kinds of issues/features you might critique:

  • What was the question being answered or addressed by this research report?
  • What method or methods were used to address/answer the research question?
  • How appropriate and effective the methods seem to be.
  • Are there legal concerns?
  • Are there ethical concerns?
  • Is the research report intended to be generalized? If so, can these results be appropriately generalized to a broader population?
  • Are there issues related to validity or reliability, and if so, how are these issues addressed?
  • Any other issues that you would like to address.
  • You do not need to write about all of the examples above; this list is to give you an idea as to how to begin. You may also write about other issues as well.

Book IV of the Republic, by Plato, provide written answers to the following questions.

Book IV of the Republic, by Plato, provide written answers to the following questions.  Please give complete answers in complete sentences.  *

 

1. What are the three main parts of the soul, as identified in the selection?  What is the virtue distinctive to each?

2. What is justice, according to the selection?  How is justice in the individual soul similar to justice in the state?

3. What is injustice, according to the selection?  How is injustice in the individual soul similar to justice in the state?

4. What is the relationship of justice in the soul to health in the body, and of injustice in the soul to disease in the body?

After reading the assigned chapters from Book I of the Nicomachean Ethics, by Aristotle, provide written answers to the following questions.  Please give complete answers in complete sentences.

5. What does Aristotle say is “the highest of all the goods achievable by action”?  In what way does he say common opinion concurs with his conclusion concerning the highest good, and in what way is there lack of consensus on this point?

6. What three ways of life does Aristotle present as candidates for the most desirable life?  What fourth way of life does he dismiss from candidacy and why?

7. What distinction does Aristotle make between final ends and ends which are not final, and what kind of end does he say the highest good must be?

8. What does Aristotle conclude is the best good for a human being, and how does he arrive at this conclusion?

9. How does Aristotle define happiness at the beginning of chapter 13?  How does he relate happiness to virtue, and how does he decide what virtue must be for a human being?

Perspectives Impact Relationship Development And Maintenance

  A minimum of  3 scholarly peered reviewed article  each DQ must be sited using APA format 600 words for each topic 5 DQ 1 and  5 DQ 2    Note: Please see reading references below

 

Topic 5 DQ 1

How do different perspectives impact relationship development and maintenance particularly, in terms of exchange versus communal factors? Have you ever experienced these different perspectives? Provide examples.

Topic 5 DQ 2

Using the social exchange theory, equity theory and penetration theory, describe how relationships are maintained or ended. What role does attachment style play in the level of intimacy shared in friendships or intimate relationships?

 

Reading Assignments: Also see attached documents

Read Chapter 7 in Social Psychology.

URL:

http://www.gcumedia.com/digital-resources/pearson/2016/social-psychology_ebook_14e.php

  • attachment

    Topic5Whypeoplestrugglestoestablishandmaintainintimaterelationship.pdf
  • attachment

    Topic5Observedchoices.pdf

Reaction paper #1 will be based on the student’s reading of Chapter 1 & Chapter 2.

Reaction Papers

The student will be responsible to a write reaction paper to assigned chapters and a documentary

Reaction paper #1 will be based on the student’s reading of Chapter 1 & Chapter 2. This reaction paper will be 6-8 pages covering the student’s reaction to the material covered in Chapters 1 & 2.

Reaction paper #2 will be two shorter reaction papers based on the viewing of two documentaries and reading the corresponding chapters. Each reaction paper will be of approximately 500 words. You are to integrate data acquired from the chapter readings along with your reaction. These chapters are the ones related to Substance Disorders and Eating Disorders. Below are the links to the videos. Additionally, at the end of the syllabi are suggested instructions for you to read on the manner in which you write a reaction paper.

Documentary #1 is Thin

A documentary on eating disorders and their effects.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AL3FeQU4HjU&t=2061s

This is the one on youtube that is only 1 hour and 41 minutes.

Documentary # 2 is Oxycontin Express

A documentary on addiction to pain medication.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wGZEvXNqzkM&t=262s

This one is 47 minutes long.

How to Write a Reaction Paper to a Documentary & a Chapter

For you to deliver a good and compelling documentary review, it is important that you know how to write a reaction paper to a documentary. Writing reaction or response papers about documentaries require students to properly understand the given material and present and argument showing how it fits into the course work. Documentaries can be both informative and entertaining, hence, making it quite enjoyable writing response papers based on them.

Knowing how to write a reaction paper to a documentary can help you in quite a number of areas, besides passing an assignment or term paper. It is an ideal of way of enhancing your analytical and evaluation skills for better communication. The paper should focus on the ideas expressed in the documentary, including those that you agree and disagree with.

There are various approaches that can be taken when writing a response paper to a documentary. You can either decide to support the arguments or ideas in the film, or focus on disputing them. Besides, your reaction can also make a general address to the entire documentary without picking parts. Depending on the approach that you may wish to pursue, there are certain considerations on how to write a reaction paper to a documentary that you should make.

Tips on how to write a reaction paper to a documentary & a Chapter

The following guidelines will assist you in planning how to write a reaction paper to a documentary.

When told to choose a documentary to review, always go for something that you like and would be interested in watching. Avoid documentaries with complicated plots and stories that are difficult to understand.

Watch the documentary and take notes

You can only be able to write a review or response to a documentary when you understand all its elements, contents and message. Therefore, it is always advisable that you watch the documentary more than once in order to properly digest it and know what it is all about.

While watching the documentary, it is advisable to treat it more like a story or a letter. Note down some of the striking features of the film, like characters, scenes, messages and how they are relayed.

As you take notes, try to formulate arguments, make comparisons between the elements to be able to properly get the context.

Identify the focus of your review

The basis of a reaction paper is to present your opinion or thoughts about the documentary. However, these should be backed by examples or evidence from the film. Academic papers require that you identify a particular angle to pursue in writing, which will be the basis of the paper.

You need to come up with an idea based on how the documentary touched you. In case you felt it was good, give a reason with evidence to support that claim. The same should also be applied to when you are in disagreement with the material.

When identifying the focus of your paper do not simply look at the documentary, instead, compare it with your general knowledge, other films on the same subject and even comments from experts in that field. You can also relate the documentary to your personal experiences.

A good response paper should be focused on a unique perspective that is outstanding from the documentary & a Chapter 

Determine the elements to discuss

After identifying the direction to pursue in responding to the documentary, you should move into collecting points and evidence to support it. Based on the aspect that you intend to discuss in the review, gather sufficient points that are striking from the film to use in proving your reaction.

For every key point that you identify, also acquire examples or evidence from the documentary to use in proving it. All the elements that you pick should connect back to the focus of the paper and effectively evaluate your response and purpose of writing.

You can also do some research to find out more about the points to discuss in order to present a logical and compelling review. Be specific in choosing the elements to discuss for clarity. For every point, identify about two or three examples to support it.

Create an outline

An outline is a simple plan showing how you intend to present the review. It should briefly highlight the introduction, body and conclusion of the paper. The purpose of the outline is to provide you with a ‘blueprint’ of the paper and easy reference when writing.

Steps on how to write a reaction paper to a documentary & a Chapter

Just like other academic papers, a response paper should follow a particular writing format. The following procedures will direct you on how to write a reaction paper to a documentary.

Introduce the paper

Begin by giving a brief and accurate summary of the documentary in the opening statements of the paper. On this part, you should include basic information about the piece, including its title, producer, characters, and date of screening among other key elements.

You should also briefly describe the position of the producer of the documentary. The reactions to the contents of the work should be reserved for the subsequent paragraphs.

Evaluate the documentary

This should make up the bulk of the paper, and present a comprehensive evaluation of the documentary. This section highlights the body paragraphs and should clearly indicate that you have watched and understood the context of the film.

Every paragraph should properly establish and explain your position or response to the documentary, backed with evidence and examples. Devote every paragraph to a particular idea and a few related evidences.

Your stance can be supportive or opposed to the view of the producer of the film. However, it has to be well discussed in a way that readers can read and understand even without watching the documentary.

Write the conclusion

The final paragraph of a response paper should present a summary of your position on the piece. This can be achieved through restating the focus of the paper and the key points that are discussed in the body paragraphs. Remember that the conclusion should just be short and not open a fresh discussion. Avoid introducing a new idea in the conclusion since that would confuse readers and alter the flow of ideas in the paper.

On the final part, you can also compare the documentary with others in the same genre or subject in order to make readers have a better understanding of the review.

After writing, do not rush into publishing or submitting the paper to your tutor. Instead, take time to carefully read through it in order to make the necessary corrections. The paragraphs should relate logically with one another across the paper. Besides, also ensure that grammar is in order.

Adopted from: https://medium.com/@ExpertsEssays/how-to-write-a-reaction-paper-to-a-documentary-642a4a008faa

  • attachment

    bookchapter1-2.pdf

Cultural Immersion Project – Part 3

Template attached…

Cultural Immersion Project – Part 1 and Cultural Immersion Project – Part 2 attached

Subject: Jewish Religion 

Cultural Immersion Project – Part 3 Paper Instructions

Individual Encounter and Synthesis

You will conduct an in-depth, 1-hour interview with an individual or married couple from your selected cultural group in order to develop an understanding of the cultural factors that helped shape that individual’s or couple’s cultural identity.

A variety of issues may be explored in the interview. The knowledge you gained from both parts of the Cultural Immersion Project as well as your sense of the person/couple you interview will guide you in how personal you can get with your questions. Cultural groups and individuals vary on how private they are. Use their feedback regarding what areas you can probe. If the person is very open, go deeper. If not, respect that cultural boundary and ask yourself why that boundary is there. Issues that you may wish to explore during the interview include, but are not limited to, the following:

· Early childhood experiences and parental values;

· Earliest memories of recognizing membership in a culturally different group;

· The role of religion/spirituality;

· Immigration experiences;

· Similarities/differences between couples’ interactions in the U.S. to couples’ interactions in the individual’s culture;

· School experiences as a member of a cultural minority;

· Experiences with subtle racism or discrimination;

· Experiences with overt racism or discrimination;

· Ways the person/couple chose his/her/their career(s) or made career choices;

· The experience of being culturally different;

· Attitudes regarding the majority culture;

· Extent of desire to assimilate majority cultural attitudes, values, and lifestyles;

· Feelings of oppression;

· Feelings of anger toward majority culture;

· From the person’s/couple’s own cultural background, any potential racist attitudes toward or stereotyping of individuals from other particular cultures; and/or

· Strengths identified from the person’s/couple’s cultural background that help him/her/them cope with living in the U.S.

Once your interview is complete, you will answer the questions listed below. First person may be used in your answers, and you must observe correct and current APA style. The paper must have a correct title page, and you must use a reference page (no abstract is needed). A word estimate is beside each question; however, the quality of your answer is more important than the word count. You may expand further, but you do not have to do so. In addition, your paper must be supported by at least 2 scholarly sources, and at least 2 internet and/or media sources, used in project part 1. It is recommended that you use the following questions as level 1 headings to organize your paper.

1. Share some of the background of your interviewee (or couple). What is this person’s/couple’s story? (approximately 300 words)

2. How open was this person/couple? Why do you think this was? (approximately 100 words)

3. What were some key cultural events (interactions with the majority culture, experiences of racism, positive experiences with the majority culture, etc.) for this person/couple? (approximately 250 words)

4. What was your sense of this person’s/couple’s acculturation level and racial/cultural identity development? Why do you think this is the case? (approximately 200 words)

5. How did you respond emotionally toward this person/couple during the interview? Given aspects of your personal experience, why do you think you reacted this way? (approximately 250 words)

6. Based on the interview experience, what knowledge about this cultural group was added that you did not get from the previous parts of this assignment? (approximately 200 words)

7. Summarize briefly culturally sensitive theories and techniques discussed in Part II and discuss ethical and legal aspects that counselors need to consider when providing counseling services for this specific group, including issues of conflict, bias, prejudice, oppression and discrimination (approximately 200 words).

8. Summarize briefly your findings in Part I on group characteristics and reflect on the significance of multicultural sensitivity for your work as a professional counselor (school, clinical mental health, or marriage and family, whichever applies to you; approximately 150 words).

9. Remind yourself of the biblical worldview lens material considered in this course (see the presentation titled “Interpreting Culture” in the Module/Week 1 Reading & Study folder). What are some strengths or elements of common grace that you see operating in this cultural group? How can individuals pray for people in this cultural group? (approximately 200 words)

10. Which part of this immersion experience (Part 1, 2, or 3) was most helpful to you in learning about this cultural group? Why do you think this was? (approximately 100 words)

  • attachment

    TemplateforImmersionProjectpart31.docx
  • attachment

    D_ACulturalImmersionProject2.docx
  • attachment

    CulturalImmersionProjectPart1.docx

Perspectives Impact Relationship Development And Maintenance

A minimum of  3 scholarly peered reviewed article  each DQ must be sited using APA format 600 words for each topic 5 DQ 1 and  5 DQ 2    Note: Please see reading references below

 

Topic 5 DQ 1

How do different perspectives impact relationship development and maintenance particularly, in terms of exchange versus communal factors? Have you ever experienced these different perspectives? Provide examples.

Topic 5 DQ 2

Using the social exchange theory, equity theory and penetration theory, describe how relationships are maintained or ended. What role does attachment style play in the level of intimacy shared in friendships or intimate relationships?

 

Reading Assignments: Also see attached documents

Read Chapter 7 in Social Psychology.

URL:

http://www.gcumedia.com/digital-resources/pearson/2016/social-psychology_ebook_14e.php

  • attachment

    Topic5Whypeoplestrugglestoestablishandmaintainintimaterelationship.pdf
  • attachment

    Topic5Observedchoices.pdf

Article Critique – Nonexperimental Designs

For this assignment, again, is beneficial that you keep the topic you would like to research for the capstone proposal in mind. The capstone will require a literature review for your proposal, of which you may use articles obtained during this course.

Select a peer-reviewed, nonexperimental research study that exemplifies a correlational and quasi-experimental design (use keywords method, results, and discussion in your Boolean search). These studies can be found using tools such as the GCU Library and Google Scholar.

Write a 500-750-word paper that addresses the following:

  1. Compare the research design of the two studies chosen.
  2. Were the research designs appropriate to their hypothesis (the goal of the research or research question)? Why or why not?
  3. Discuss the limitations of drawing conclusions from a nonexperimental study.
  4. Did the study have a random sample? Were there other problems that were noticed?

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

Factors Impacting School Performance

Factors Impacting School Performance

Research has consistently shown that the relationship between intelligence and school performance explains only 25 percent of the variance. Hence, success in school must be related to other factors as well.

Based on your understanding of the above statement, answer the following questions:

  • What is your informed opinion on this relatively low variance? Is this surprising for you? Why or why not?
  • Which factors, other than intelligence, may impact school performance?
  • What role could counselors play in fostering these additional factors in order to enhance school performance?

Respond to at least two posts

  • attachment

    AbilityTests.html.zip
  • attachment

    PerformanceTesting.html.zip
  • attachment

    student1response14.docx
  • attachment

    student2response7.docx